Below you will find pages that utilize the taxonomy term “Statutory Interpretation”
Le Maistre v. Leffers
Le Maistre v. Leffers (1948)
1) Link to the Actual Opinion
Read the U.S. Reports opinion (PDF)
2) Summary of the Opinion
This case involved the application of the Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Civil Relief Act (SSCRA). The Court emphasized that the Act must be liberally construed to protect servicemembers, ensuring that those in military service are not disadvantaged in civil legal proceedings because of their service obligations.
3) Why It Mattered
The decision cemented the principle that courts should interpret servicemember protections broadly, not narrowly, in order to carry out Congress’s intent.
Conroy v. Aniskoff
Conroy v. Aniskoff (1993)
1) Link to the Actual Opinion
Read the U.S. Reports opinion (PDF)
2) Summary of the Opinion
The case concerned the tolling of statutes of limitations under the Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Civil Relief Act (SSCRA). The Supreme Court unanimously reaffirmed that the Act must be read liberally in favor of servicemembers, rejecting attempts to narrowly limit its scope.
3) Why It Mattered
The ruling reinforced decades of precedent that servicemember protections are not just technicalities but must be given their full protective effect.